All case studies
Evaluation accuracy
13 of 15: AI that matches expert judgment, and catches what it misses
The context
A hiring manager had already screened 300 resumes by hand and shortlisted 15 candidates for phone interviews. To pressure-test the shortlist, they ran the same pool through Octopyd’s AI Talent Tournament with Ivy.
At a glance
- résumés screened
- 300
- hand-picked candidates in Ivy’s top 30
- 13 / 15
- strong candidates the manager had missed
- 3
The results
- 13 of the manager’s 15 hand-picked candidates landed in Octopyd’s top 30, an 87% overlap with experienced human judgment.
- Ivy surfaced 3 additional strong candidates that the manual review had overlooked, each ranked high on the Octopyd list.
- The full 300-resume evaluation ran in a fraction of the time a manual pass takes, with an explainable score behind every ranking.
The takeaway
Ivy’s explainable evaluation closely mirrors an expert recruiter’s instincts, then widens the net so no strong candidate slips through the cracks.
Your next great hire
Build a hiring process around your team.
See how Octopyd can support your hiring, from sourcing to offer.